[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: PC: [Fwd: (erielack) CSX president resigns]
- Subject: RE: PC: [Fwd: (erielack) CSX president resigns]
- From: "Armstrong, John A" <ArmstronJA@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:05:58 -0400
- Content-return: allowed
One big difference. All parties involved were and are still making money! I wouldn't get carried away.
John
> ----------
> From: Steffan Forbes[SMTP:steffanf -AT- hotmail.com]
> Reply To: penn-central -AT- smellycat.com
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 11:40 AM
> To: penn-central -AT- smellycat.com
> Subject: Re: PC: [Fwd: (erielack) CSX president resigns]
>
>
> Hmmm. Let's see. Large merger with poor integration, management
> problems... large debt... tumbling profits... poor track maintenance. Is it
> just me, or does this look like 1968-69 all over again? So, what's next...
> Conrail II in 2005?
> -G.B.
>
>
>
>
> >From: Mark Kerlick <markkerlick -AT- att.net>
> >Reply-To: penn-central -AT- smellycat.com
> >To: Chip Syme <Engrchip -AT- aol.com>, Fleischer Rick <RJFlei@aol.com>,
> >ROSS JACK <rljack -AT- pathway.net>, PC list <penn-central@smellycat.com>
> >Subject: PC: [Fwd: (erielack) CSX president resigns]
> >Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:29:58 -0400
> >
> >Not a good sign for stockholders. A PC rerun????
> ><< message3.txt >>
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index