[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: PC: RE:Bicentennial paint
- Subject: RE: PC: RE:Bicentennial paint
- From: "Armstrong, John A" <ArmstronJA@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 10:37:19 -0500
- Content-return: allowed
The SDP45 were certainly not leased for a dollar! The leasor certainly did not place restriction on their use.
> Wrong, as usual.
>
> I have the 1973 DPA-LTA roster. The U34CH fleet is listed under Erie
> Lackawanna, with a note that they are leased from New Jersey. (I guess
> someone could say that EL didn't have any SDP45 since they were leased,
> too.)
>
> I found a couple of diesel locomotive books that show the U34CH in its
> modified EL paint scheme. One shows the first U34CH and the other shows
> one just a few units from the end of the run.
>
> NJDOT bought equipment to be used on various roads, starting in 1968, to
> subsidize commuter service. Central of New Jersey, for example, received
> a GP40P fleet.
>
> All of the systems subsidized by NJDOT became part of Conrail in 1976.
> This continued for several years. In 1981 The Northeast Rail Service Act
> ordered Conrail to get out of the commuter business by the end of 1982.
> NJ Transit was formed in 1982, and took over their commuter operations on
> January 1, 1983.
>
> Does anyone have any photos of Penn Central lettered equipment financed
> by New Jersey, since NJDOT subsidized some ex-Pennsy lines? Also, does
> anyone have more photos of NJDOT subsidized Conrail equipment?
>
> Bryan
>
>
> On Sun, 27 Feb 2000 01:09:29 -0500 "NEW HAVEN U25B"
> <ERIE-LACKAWANNA -AT- prodigy.net> writes:
> > Ownership plate on U34CH's stated NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF
> > TRANSPORTATION,
> > OWNER. The engines were bought outright by the state and not
> > financed and
> > leased to EL plus the equipment at $1.00 per engine, per car, per
> > month.
> > plus maintenance. The paint scheme was not an EL inspired one as
> > silver
> > stripe was wider than the EL Maroon stripe. NJDOT GP7's and one
> > GP40P where
> > painted as such as were many E8's. U34CH's were purchased at EL's
> > request
> > because at the time the NJDOT did not have experience in purchasing
> > locomotives and bought what EL wanted, a modified U36C with HEP
> > that reduce HP to 3420, thus classified it as a U34CH. EL figured
> > they could
> > use the engines on freights over weekends when some lines did not
> > operate
> > weekend commuter service. NJDOT stopped the practice. Maintenance
> > base was
> > Elizabethport and not Hornell. What EL did was illegal and not in
> > the
> > agreeement with NJDOT. There were no leases on U34CH's. They were
> > 100% NJDOT
> > owned and simply transferred in 1983 to NJDOT's railroad division
> > known as
> > NJT. Only one FL9 5023 was lettered CR for obvious reasons. Engine
> > 5023 was
> > the last 100% New Haven RR FL9 on the property in much need of a new
> > repainting. NH paint was chipping and faded. It was totally
> > sandblasted the
> > came out of Harmon shops in MTA blue and Yellow indicating MTA
> > ownership as
> > all other FL9's with white CR name and logo.
> >
> >
> > > most likely NJ DOT financed their purchase by EL, since they wore
> > NJ DOT
> > > colors rather than G/M/Y EL colors. I know from one of the EL
> > books that
> > > EL wasn't supposed to use them west of Hornell when they did
> > borrow one
> > for
> > > frieght work - the idea being to keep them close so they would be
> > where
> > > they belonged Monday morning. Also, other than the Bicen unit I
> > don't
> > > think any were ever lettered Conrail like FL9's were. It could be
> > that it
> > > took the original lease to expire before the actual title was
> > transfered
> > to
> > > NJT.
> > >
> > > Did PC paint anything besides the one buisness car for the
> > Bicentennial?
> > I
> > > know EL had it's SD45/SDP45 combo and LV did a caboose, but I'm
> > pretty
> > sure
> > > RDG and CNJ went without... looks like the 2 PC engines that
> > were
> > > painted were done by Conrail, though.
> > >
> > > ----------
> > > > From: Garrett Rea <Garrett.Rea -AT- worldnet.att.net>
> > > > To: penn-central -AT- smellycat.com>
> > > > Subject: Re: PC: RE:Bicentennial paint
> > > > Date: Saturday, February 26, 2000 6:33 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From: NEW HAVEN U25B <ERIE-LACKAWANNA -AT- prodigy.net>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >The U34CH is not CR property and only lettered CR on the upper
> > side of
> > > long
> > > > >hood. Engine is also marked with NJDOT logos. A year after the
> > the
> > > bicent
> > > > >the engine remained red white blue and had the CONRAIL name
> > painted out
> > > and
> > > > >renumbered back to 4151 which is its real number.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Would this be the same as CR U34CH 4151, an ex EL unit? It is
> > shown as
> > a
> > > CR
> > > > unit in 1977, based in Secaucus, working commuter service on
> > former EL
> > > > territory. This from CR's 77 roster. Thirty-two units listed
> > total,
> > > 4151
> > > > first of the series. As N. H, points out, there is a question
> > to actual
> > > > ownership, as there was a lot of foreign power on CR in those
> > > > days....however, it is under the "owned" category, not "leased".
> > Other
> > > > locos listed that went to NJDOT are not included in the totals
> > active by
> > > > class, whilst the U34CHs are shown to be CR owned, but the
> > pictured unit
> > > has
> > > > NJDOT logos....CONFUSING!
> > > >
> > > > GWR
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index