Re: PC: PC modelers/more than 2 genus types

["Roger P. Hensley" <rhensley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> From:          "Craig E. Hatter" <ns4610 -AT- bluegrass.net>
> To:            "Penn-Central" <penn-central -AT- smellycat.com>
> Subject:       PC: PC modelers/more than 2 genus types
> Date:          Sat, 26 Feb 2000 19:54:04 -0500
> Reply-to:      penn-central -AT- smellycat.com

> I would classify those types as the haves and the have nots. The haves,into
> which I throw myself and individuals such as Mr. Rea,have the skill sets and
> knowledge base to accurately portray PC models. We WANT our models to be
> correct. It is our desire. The have nots on the other hand do not possess
> these skills,and by and large don't care to exert the effort or education
> needed to become a have. Why? Because they are not MODELING. They are
> playing with a train,whomever roads scheme is on the side.

	I beg your pardon! No matter what I chose for roadname
	or trains, when a 17 year old can walk into my basement,
	look at my city and say, "That's Anderson.", I'm modeling!
	
	And why did you bring up the Monon here? Didn't you stir up 
	enough flames over there with your caustic remarks? This is
	the PC list.

	If you are a have, I don't think that I am interested in being
	one. I prefer to model to represent and that is MY choice. If
	this gets me kicked off, so be it. I'll just go back into my
	basement and 'play with my trains.'



Roger

Roger Hensley - 
   00rphensley -AT- bsuvc.bsu.edu - rhensley@anderson.cioe.com
                             
=== http://bsuvc.bsu.edu/~00rphensley/cidwelco.html ================
=== The Railroads of Madison County, Indiana =======================