[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PC: RDG locomotives
- Subject: Re: PC: RDG locomotives
- From: "Bill K" <pontiac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1998 23:00:03 -0400
Making D&H into "Competition" for Conrail was one of the dumber things the
ICC ever did anyhow. Chessie dumped their 40% of the RDG i think by the
time those GP39's were ordered, though; they were the last new engines for
the RDG. Those are the biggest faults I find in Conrail though - making
one huge system out of it and then making this joke of competition out of
the D&H. End result is other than blue engines, today's Conrail is more or
less Penn Central. well except they are making money, lol...
Bill's Syracuse rail page
http://www.dreamscape.com/pontiac/rail.html
----------
: From: Mark & Cynthia Du Vall <mc -AT- wnol.net>
: To: penn-central -AT- smellycat.com
: Subject: Re: PC: RDG locomotives
: Date: Tuesday, July 28, 1998 11:29 AM
:
:
:
: > The Reading GP39-2's were bought on Chessie's ticket and were
: > returned to CSX when the lease expired in 1991/92. A Swag is the
: > GP40-2's were a USRA deal as they stayed w/ Conrail but it's only
: > a guess....
: >
: > Doug
: >
:
: I believe that the GP-39-2's that you are talking about are the ones that
: the D&H had on there roster. The reason why they were returned to the
CSX.
: The CSX financed the rebuilding of them for at the time power short
: D&H/NYSW. Both the CSX and the NS had a big interest in the NYSW
: controlling the D&H. This gave both railroads an alternative to shipping
: on Conrail in the Northeast. The CSX was just helping out themselves by
: doing that. Remember they were given to CSX just like the NYSW B-40-8's
: that they financed when the CP was given control of the D&H. Blast the
ICC
: for such a poor decision.
:
:
: Mark
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index