|
One of my small, small gripes with the first volume was the lack of
more deatiled regional maps showing the lines featured in the book. For
those of us, who never explored those areas of the PC, it helps
"locate" the images in the book. Ended up printing out the div maps from Jerry's PC site and keeping those in the book. No biggie, but just wondering if Vol. 2 has more detailed maps., or if it's back to the site for some more map printing. --Andy robert.holzweiss@xxxxxxxxx wrote: I agree with Bob Stetser's post. Vol. 2 features the usual high quality Morning Sun photo reproduction although some of the photos are a bit fuzzy probably because of the quality of 1960s/70s cameras and speed of the subjects. Most pics are new (at least to me) and shot for the most part by photogs who are well known on this list. Problem of getting high quality overhead shots in electrified territory is obvious because most (not all)shots are at ground level. Branch line coverage is decent although no mention Danbury or Canaan Branches. Just one pic of Cedar Hill too. West Shore (ex-NYC) has just two pics plus harbor tugs. The intro is what you would expect and really reiterates what most of us already know. Captions are fine especially considering that most pics had no information about date, location or details about the subject. The author did his homework and gathered what information he could. Unusual for a Morning Sun book is the caption mix-up on pages 8-9. Photos (or captions) on bottom of 8 and top of 9 are switched. In all, a quality effort and a must have for the PC fan but perhaps too much stuffed into one volume. Ex-NYC electrified lines and West Shore could probably be their own volume, especially if West Shore is covered to Selkirk. This is a mild criticism of course considering the lack of PC specific books and the high quality of the photos in this volume. Bob Holzweiss P.S. Kudos to the PC Society for the latest issue of the PC Post. Received mine today and read it cover-to-cover right away. Another fine effort especially the FL9 piece. To all those that contributed and worked on the editing, thank you for your time and effort. On 4/1/09, Bob & Emily Stetser <stets@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: |