[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
PC: RE: Re: LV C628s not all built to PC/PRR specs
- Subject: PC: RE: Re: LV C628s not all built to PC/PRR specs
- From: "Armstrong, John A" <ArmstronJA@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:59:49 -0500
- Content-return: allowed
Cab signals? They didn't even have radios. LV specs but not PRR.
> ----------
> From: NEW HAVEN U25B[SMTP:ERIE-LACKAWANNA -AT- prodigy.net]
> Reply To: penn-central -AT- smellycat.com
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2000 4:48 PM
> To: penn-central -AT- smellycat.com
> Subject: PC: Re: LV C628s not all built to PC/PRR specs
>
> Yes, ALCO did rebuild Monon 400-409 to PRR specs. Nose mars light was plated
> over, cab-signals and dynamic braking installed. Monon units did not have
> dynamics.
>
>
> > The LV number 633-641 are the ex-Monon #400-#407. I don't believe that
> Alco
> > rebuilt these while in their used locomotive lot.
> >
> >
>
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index