[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
PC: Re: PC U-Boats...
- Subject: PC: Re: PC U-Boats...
- From: "Garrett Rea" <Garrett.Rea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 08:19:19 -0000
What was the box on the roof behind the cab and open screen sides on PRR/PC
U25Cs for? It is different than other U25Cs that I have seen.
Garrett Rea
-----Original Message-----
From: Gregg Benedict <benedict -AT- htc.net>
To: penn-central -AT- smellycat.com <penn-central@smellycat.com>
Date: Wednesday, February 24, 1999 9:07 PM
Subject: PC: PC U-Boats...
> Here's a good one for all the PC modelers out there. This involves
>GE U-Boats once owned by NYC, PRR and those bought by PC after the
>merger.
> First, concerning 6-axle units owned by PC and PRR: There seems to
>be two different styles of trucks used on these units. In Yanosey's PC
>Power, I have seen U-28C's and U-33C's with both the Adirondack and GSC
>type trucks. It appears that all 6-axle U-Boats were delivered to both
>the PRR and PC with the GSC type trucks. Later on in life, some units
>were changed to the Adirondack-type. I can not be sure if this is truly
>the case. Also of note, it appears that the units I have seen pictures
>of with the Adirondack-type of trucks are actually Conrail units still
>in PC paint. Did Conrail do the truck-swapping? Hopefully someone can
>clarify this.
> Second, it appears that all the U-Boats went through several "phases"
>during production. Right now, I'm talking about the U-28 through U-33
>class. The U-28C, U-30C and U-33C all came in two distinct versions.
>The differences are not all that subtle either. The rear radiators were
>radically different as were the battery boxes under the cabs. It seems
>that just about all of the PC units were of the early type (phase 1?),
>except for a few units. What I want to know is, were any of the U-30C,
>U-33C, U-30B of the second (later) type. This is a preliminary guess
>and I would like it to be corrected if it is wrong:
>
>U-30B (ex-NYC)....... all early type (phase 1)
>U-33B (ex-NYC) [2 units]..... both early type (phase 1)
>U-33B (PC bought)................ all later type (phase 2)
>U-23B (PC bought)................ all later type (phase 2) {probably
>not available in phase 1}
>
>U-28C (ex-PRR)........... all early type (phase 1) {probably not
>available in phase 2}
>U-30C (ex-PRR)........... all early type (phase 1)
>U-33C (PC bought)....... all early type (phase 1)
>U-23C (PC bought)....... all later type (phase 2) {probably not
>available in phase 1)
>
>I omitted the U-25B, U-25C and U-28B because I know all of the
>variations.
>
> Looking at pictures of these units from other railroads, I noticed
>that PC U-30B's, U-30C's and U-33C's looked completely different from
>those of other railroads. Is this the case or are my references giving
>a false-representation? For a quick explanation of what I am talking
>about, look on page 164 of the PC Power book. Pictured are U-33C's from
>both PC and EL. It is pretty easy to see the differences between the
>two units on both pictures on that page. I know the PC U-33C's were in
>fact the first U-33C's built by GE, but I doubt this is the case for ALL
>of GE units owed by PC.
> Overall, I want some insight into this dilemma and perhaps an
>explanation (if possible).
>
>
>-Gregg B.
>
>
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index