[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
PC: Re: Re: (erielack) No Lackawanna video...
- Subject: PC: Re: Re: (erielack) No Lackawanna video...
- From: "NEW HAVEN U25B" <ERIE-LACKAWANNA@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 00:27:22 -0500
From: Mark Nolan <dmnolan -AT- usit.net>
To: <penn-central -AT- smellycat.com>
Date: Tuesday, March 16, 1999 12:24 AM
Subject: PC: Re: (erielack) No Lackawanna video...
>>>Balkin, who operates a video production company from his
>>>home, was charged with attempted sexual assault, endangering the
>>>welfare of a child and eluding arrest.
>>>Picked this up from another e-mail list I belong to. If anyone wants
>>>a Mark 1 video I would buy them now from the dealer who has them
>>>for they will be gone shortly.
>>I think BN Bob needs to get his priorities straightened out......how could
>>anyone support this jerk's business and sleep at night?
> What happened to innocent until proven guilty? From other post I have
>seen, the owner of Mark 1 video has denied the charges. Time will tell.
>I've read the same. Cannot be charged for meeting no one. A Mark 1 ad
appears in current Railfan
Main Index |