[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PC: What killed PC?





On Tue, 5 Jan 1999 Gene.Fusco -AT- lsil.com wrote:

> 
> > agree with your choice of power the PC would have had. PC did prefer 
> > ALCO's and GE's over EMD's.
> 
> Did it really? I was under the opposite impression.
> 
> Alco was history by 1969.
> 
> Close to 500 GP38 locos were purchased vs the U23B 
> 
> Far more SD40 and SD45 locos were picked up by PC than the comparable
> U-Boat or Century six axles.
> 
> GM didn't have a switcher option to compete with the SW1200 or SW1500 that
> PC bought scores of to replace aging Alco S1,2,3 & 4 locos.

SW1200 and SW1500's were made by GM if my failing memory serves me
correctly


> 
> 
> 
> I only speak to the diesel market of 1968-1976, though.  Had PC survived to
> the present day, It would have a mix of power roughly equivalent to what
> Conrail has currently.
> 
> Nothing PC could do would have saved Alco.  Too bad, since I think Alco had
> the best style department of the Loco makers. (With the sole exception of
> the GP30 :^)
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Gene Fusco        | (970) 206-5405         Gene.Fusco -AT- lsil.com     KB0ZMZ
>                   |
> S/W Development   |   Why do I take pictures of trains?
> LSI Logic Inc.    |   Because they're too big to take home.
> Fort Collins CO.  |                                                
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

William J. Enser         Co-Net Admin - Tech Supp & Validations 
alcoman -AT- bluemoon.net     net.bluemoon.net - Blue Moon Online System    
x2 & K56flex/V.90 Access www.railfan.net - The Railfan Network   
http://www.bluemoon.net  mud.bluemoon.net 4000 - MoonMud        
bbs.bluemoon.net         irc.bluemoon.net-ZUHnet Buffalo,NY IRC Server

Home Page:http://alcoman.railfan.net                                   



Home | Main Index | Thread Index